Jersans
-
Posts
742 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Articles
AVCS Bug Reports (automated)
AVCS Bug Reports (manual)
VG Wiki
Blogs
Store
Everything posted by Jersans
-
Fair point. I'm sure the Russians will be more than ready to kick our asses. So let's just say we start a sign-up topic. If enough sign-up meaning more than 20-30 we're game. Also I'm scared of Volod. The dude is a killer.
-
I'm playing with the Russians. I want to win
-
Extra note. I'm sure the Russians are more than happy to kick our asses So could be Russians vs. the rest of us. Why not?
-
Well guys. We can totally organise this. We don't need VG servers for this because it would be wayyyy too much hassle. But we can make teams. Find some low population server: https://www.gametracker.com/search/bf2/?sort=3&order=ASC and get it on. I mean we can just play OPFOR and BLUFOR right? We just need three things. 1.) A commander for each team. 2.) Squad leads that are willing to lead and listen. 3.) Enough people. Between us we can make it country or regional teams. *Note using our own servers would be easier.
-
Just a question Ted? Do we have any assets left since we wasted them all on the last maps?
-
Hmmm full assault this time. Looks like we're in for a big time. I say we hold the lines. At all costs.
-
Oh my. Looks like we're damned to hell.
-
In Brazil there are 3 ways. Be a clever criminal, be a bad criminal or be a stupid criminal. All the good people get left behind.
-
So we lost practically all vehicles didn't we. Man that was rough. Good fun but rough.
-
My point exactly. I don't mind, I will enjoy playing with any squad leader or run a squad, doesn't matter as long as we're balanced to win these maps and try to avoid last moment improvising trying to save what can be saved. I think we can try to avoid this by having a framework. Like i.e. having squad leaders sign up and we can assign grunts on the day. Everybody happy right? Or am I missing the point?
-
Oh well that changes everything. So then we would be on 3x5INF 6xAPC 4xLOGI for example. Or 3x7 MECH SQD and 4xLOGI and 2xspotters. Just thinking here...
-
Looking at the amount of logistic vehicles I'm gonna guess no. That's why I assume the logistics squad is probably the most important squad. Come to think of it, I might sign up as SL for the logistics squad unless we can find a better candidate.
-
Well I meant to balance the squads. Last round we had, I believe, Double and Hater with two full squads and Kav and my 'squad' had to merge at the last minute to be effective. Good fun but quite chaotic. Therefore I think it's best to have smaller more agile teams for assault and secure and larger solid teams to defend with the APC and logistics for support. I'm not even sure if that makes sense but I just want to throw it out there and see what you guys think. For example Operation Gothic Serpent: If I'm correct we have roughly 35 players maximum that can play, in this case (for example) 3x8 members is already 24 people add 6xAPC and 4xLOGI + 1xCO and you're at 35 people. We could possibly add a spotting/sniper team with the CO and that's the defending map if we get roughly 35 players. I don't know. What you guys think?
-
Will there be sign-up limitations per INF SQD for the most effectiveness? When I look at the maps I see we need at least 3 full INF squads to defend (Operation Gothic Serpent). But for the assault map (Operation Silver Anvil) it's probably better to limit to 5-man squads for easier mobility and risk-management. Assault-Secure-Defend-Assault etc. Unless I'm reading the maps wrong. What do you think? Anyhoo I'm signing up with Kav's infantry SQD (if that's okay Kav?) and if needed I can run a seperate fire-team or SQD.
-
Looks like the best option is to buy some more memory. I think I have 16gb (2x8gb) and that isn't enough sometimes. But my PC is an old beast.
-
Don't know man, just file the report. Also - honesty wins more here. Liars don't. Just a hint. Our head admins will look up the 101 and answer. If I were you I'd speak the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Even if it is bad.
-
There's a process for this. Effectively explain the situation why you were banned and propose why you should be unbanned. Think about it and fill out the form.
-
Regardless of anything I'd (if I were you) really put in the reason why you should be unbanned. Meanwhile please work on that and hold while our admins and the banning admin responds. Thank you.
-
Okay. Double bad luck maps. This should be pretty cool. Not to mention I can't wait to play INS again or at least test the maps.
-
Petition for Peter Wang ROTC cadet killed in school shooting
Jersans replied to =VG= GRNANDGLD's topic in Open Chat
I think all of those kids should get the honers they deserve. I'm afraid my European mind cannot justify what happened and just because Mr. Wang was a cadet I don't think he deserves more. I think you all as Americans need to make sure guns are almost impossible to get into the hands of crazy people. Especially guns that are made to kill people, as many people as possible. I'm sorry for Mr. Wang. And the other kids. But they was just kids, all of them. What I'm saying is that your thoughts and prayers are never going to be enough. I'm sorry. All those kids shouldn't have gotten killed. Mr. Wang was probably brave but all of them should be honored. -
But wait. Am I that old. Member since 2011. Where are my tears!!!! No but seriously. Thank you for the awesome community. All of you.
- 23 replies
-
- 13
-
-
-
*bump* @=VG= keed Will we run through some battle plan? I looked at both scenario's and my thoughts for map A are pretty straight-forward but I have questions about map B.
-
To be fair isn't there such a thing that live streams games? I will most likely be there but it'd be awesome to stream it regardless. Anyone know how to do that?
-
I volunteer.
